theory of everything
december 23, 2023the theory of everything is everything. the only way to encapsulate the universe and its ways would be through experiencing/knowing every perspective. it simply becomes everything. if each effect is created by a cause, then the theory should include every cause and its effect. this includes the effect of forming theories of the universe like the string theory, the god particle, big bang, etc and their corresponding causes. the theory of everything is every theory, every thought, every gust of wind and star explosion. the theory of the universe is an equation in which every thought/action is both another variable and the answer. if you want to squeeze the entire universe into a “theory,” it must truly include EVERYTHING. it must include disproved theories, squirrels, stories, technology, time. the theory of everything is you and your evolution, your conscious, your body, your actions. these all affect the theory. the theory is the collective mind expanding with the universe. expanding the mind expands the universe. the theory is not a predictable model, why would one expect to define an ever-changing language-less universe with the rigid outlines of words? there is no “theory” of everything, the theory is simply observing how all is a mere process. it is so subtly obvious that we miss it completely, there’s no way it could be that simple right? it is not changes it is progression. progressive change. the theory of everything is the observation that everything makes as everything progresses. it is the universe adding subtitles to the show. if anything is possible, what stops every possibility from happening? if everything changes, then everything that could ever happen eventually will. what stops things from happening differently? it is partially us trying to theorize everything, adding rules to phenomena that we want to agree on and so therefore don’t allow ourselves to see the progression of all that arises. we find something that works, give it rules and names, and let the rules rule us in turn. the particles behave as we tell them to, or so we think. but what if we let go of the rules? do particles only exist under the rules of how we say they should? why would they? our desire to figure out the hows and whys only deceive us further, for we are searching for an answer to a question that only exists under our rules. what would you say to the moon, if she asked you to explain the theory of everything? don’t you think she knows already? there is no one answer, no single theory to everything, since everything is changed by everything else. it could never be complete since it would then include an end. and only after the end would it be complete.